Cue theory in judicial decisions

The Supreme Court, public opinion and decision-making: Research roundup

Vertical versus Horizontal Precedent Psychological Review,— For example, Olson determined that of the 11 quality perception studies in which cue interaction could occur, 9 investigations found such effects e.

Unfortunately, researchers could be caught in a social dilemma: A theory that is superior in both aspects to another one has a higher empirical content. For these reasons, therefore, it is suggested that future attempts to experimentally assess the impact of specific extrinsic cues on perceived quality should also incorporate intrinsic cues in the design especially the kinds of cues obtained through actual product usage--e.

Definitions of Judicial Activism It is therefore imperative to study appearance per se and imperative to study how learning causes changes in appearance. Linear models in decision making. As we have shown, precision could easily be improved by adding simple assumptions or limitations to the theories i.

The functional relationship between levels of a cue and degrees of perceived quality is expected to be product specific and, therefore, is left to empirical determination. The ruling class is composed of the ruling elite and the sub-elites.

The hierarchical structure of the judiciary provides avenues of appeals and uniform interpretation of the law at all court levels including the use of stare decisis. One possibility ultimately to annihilate empirical content is to formulate the core premises of a theory in terms of existential statements.

Intrinsic-Extrinsic The intrinsic-extrinsic dimension as described earlier of the quality cue model Cue theory in judicial decisions a dichotomous classificatory variable which has no direct effect on the process of cue utilization, but rather may be useful as a basis for determining the relative order in which individual cues from a set will enter the judgment process.

Each student should meet with the instructor to go over these readings before the day of the class presentation. Cue CV is the individual consumer's self-confidence in his ability to distinguish the cue and make accurate evaluations and judgments concerning it.

They give fresh impetus to theorizing e.

Elite theory

However, we observe a trend towards the very opposite direction, at least in our field of judgment and decision making. If the newly recruited cue causes some other perceptual attribute to vary—as is almost always the case—then the observer will find it difficult if not impossible to follow the experimenter's instruction to use only the trained attribute when responding.

Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Single heuristic theories often make predictions concerning multiple dependent variables such as choices, decision time, confidence, and information search. Cue theory suggests that perception is based on the combination of sensory data in the form of cues and cognitive processing.


Numerous decision makers relying on strategy Y would not count. Representative design and the probability theory in a functional psychology. Those that are not are available through these sources will be available over Docuweb http: The final conclusion actually a combination of several is based upon both the present data and a critical review of the previous quality perception literature see Olson, We will discuss these developments and core points of criticism in the last section of this paper and aim to rule out some misunderstandings.

Despite these reforms, we posit a relationship between the campaign Only after a theory has successfully passed evaluation on the logical level can it be subjected to critical empirical testing.

They have a high level of universality. Role of state supreme courts in the vast majority of litigation; Status of litigants appearing in state supreme courts; The main objective of the course is to introduce students to the literature in this area, and to understand how judges make decisions, and what are the influences of such decisions.

Experienced hunters believe that they are familiar with cues as to what is a turkey in the bush, so when they see a movement, they expect it and perceive it to be a turkey. Making choices without trade-offs. All of these investigations found that intrinsic cues e.

Absent substantial context, even a well-meaning listener often cannot gloss a deeper meaning. If we believe the experts are well calibrated and have independent information, we might use the multiplicative rule: Part I recounts several important and heretofore unexplored moments in the history of the term "judicial activism.

Their work gave rise to the empirical sciences governed by the notion that a proposition has to stand the ground against reality in order to be accepted.A few states, including Wisconsin, attempted to curb the influence of money and politics on judicial decisions by including nonpartisan elections and public financing of campaigns in their system of judicial selection.

The theory that appellate judges' votes may be explained by knowing more than just their basic attitudes. Judges realize that the fate of their policy goals often depends on the values of other decision markers, such as colleagues on the bench, the president, and members of Congress.

1 Can Any Legal Theory Constrain Any Judicial Decision? by Anthony D’Amato*, 43 University of Miami Law Review (Jan ) Abstract: A growing number of legal scholars have recently revived the American legal realist thesis that legal theory does not dictate the result in any particular case because legal theory itself is indeterminate.

The context of the judicial decision, which is comparative by nature, shapes which aspects of the case stand out and draw the judge's attention. By focusing judicial attention on such salient aspects of the case, legally irrelevant information can aect judicial decisions.

Cambridge University Press - Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., legal theory, and judicial restraint - by Frederic R. Kellogg Index.

A Utilitarian Theory of Judicial Decision Thomas Morawetz University of Connecticut School of Law judges or one seeking criteria for what counts as justification for judicial decisions.

I shall take it as the latter, as a question about the criteria by which judicial decisions are to .

Cue theory in judicial decisions
Rated 0/5 based on 69 review